Net Zero by 2050

Net Zero by 2050

Share this post

Net Zero by 2050
Net Zero by 2050
'Dirty' Coal
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More

'Dirty' Coal

Ian Sutton's avatar
Ian Sutton
Mar 19, 2024
∙ Paid
Share
Coal-Washing-shutterstock_284971985

The phrase ‘dirty coal’ seems to have become one word. But all fossil fuels emit carbon dioxide (CO2) and other greenhouse gases. So why does coal have such a bad reputation?

There are two possible explanations. The first is that coal, being a solid, it leaves behind ash and slag that has to be disposed of. This is an environmental challenge, but it is a manageable challenge. The second reason for coal’s bad reputation is that it contains a higher carbon to hydrogen ratio than other fuels, particularly natural gas — which is primarily methane (CH4 — four hydrogen atoms for each carbon atom). Therefore, for a given energy output, coal emits more of the greenhouse gas carbon dioxide (CO2) than other fuels.

One way around this problem is to burn coal in an oxy-combustion process. Because nitrogen is removed from the air in the combustion gas the flue gas contains just CO2 and water vapor. The CO2 still has to be captured and sequestered. But, once the water content is condensed, the flue gas is almost pure CO2. Hence it is much easier and more economical to dispose of the CO2 compared to the carbon capture and sequestration technology needed for a conventional flue stack.

The following sketch illustrates how this process would work.

Credit: Ian Sutton

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to Net Zero by 2050 to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Ian Sutton
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share

Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More